crystal renn Image

My dear auntie Janice owns a plus-sized clothing and footwear business called Boots for Broads that custom makes boots and clothing for larger ladies. She was interviewed for the Sydney Morning Herald this week (proud much!) and there is one hell of a debate going on over there. Basically the article outlines that as the people of our country are growing larger (an undeniable fact) there are more designers that are catering for this growth such as Boots for Broads and City Chic. There are quite a few commenters out there that disagree with this movement and make the point that people that are overweight should not be offered fashionable clothing choices as they are a strain on our health care system and that denying them fashionable clothes will be an incentive for weight loss. The other side is arguing that plus-sized women exist, are beautiful, and should have the same choices in fashion as their slimmer counter parts. The debate is rather fierce at the moment but both sides are throwing some pretty rational punches and I thought that I would hand this feud over to my readers…

Questions are… Do you agree that plus-sized fashions are allowing already unhealthily overweight people to remain so? What’s your definition of plus-sized? Is being ‘plus-sized’ truly a choice?

I’m curious to see what people think. Put your gloves on… lets throw ourselves in the boxing ring!

Love Lady Smaggle

xxx